Pride Of Baghdad @ Amazon.com
|
Speaking to a joint session of Congress for the duration of his annual State of the Union Address, President Bush outlined his 2007 domestic agenda, called on Congress to help his new Iraq strategy, and laid out the aftermaths of defeat in the Middle East. Bush started the 50-minute speech by honoring Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco for getting the firstborn woman Speaker of the House. In an evident appeal for bipartisanship, Bush went on to suggest that a government disunited on party lines could come together on legislative attempts aimed towards the mutual good. “Our citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on,” said Bush, “as long as we are more than willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done.” The atmosphere of bipartisanship speedily disappeared, however, as Bush started out outlining his new domestic agenda. Though sure items such as cutting gasoline consumption by 20 percent over 10 years, increased investment in substitute energy sources, and comprehensive immigration reform earned applause from both sides of the aisle, Democrats demurred when Bush called for medical liability reform and tax deductions to support states provide private health insurance to citizens. The lingering partisan divisions were most apparent when Bush at firstborn called for a balanced federal budget, a goal cheered by both Republicans and Democrats, but then added that it will have to be done without raising taxes, a stipulation cheered only by Republicans. The segmentations in audience reaction for the most part continued once Bush launched into the alien policy percentage of his speech. Though calls to aid U.S. troops and intelligence personnel who uncover and stop terrorist actions garnered applause from both sides of the aisle, when the subject turned to Iraq, reactions were more one-sided. Bush made the case for his new Iraq system of deploying 21,500 more troops to Baghdad and Anbar province by likeable to victory and outlining what he called the “consequences of failure.” “Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. So let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory,” said Bush. The President went on to remind the legislators that irrespective of their arguments and votes for or versus the war, “you did not vote for failure.” Bush suggested that failure in Iraq could have more outstanding aftermaths in the region as sectarian violence spreads. He specifically brought up Iran’s influence over Shia extremists as a source of territorial instability that would worsen must the United States leave Iraq precipitously. “If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure, the Iraqi government would be overrun by extremists on all sides. We could suppose an epic battle amidst Shia extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni extremists aided by al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. A contagion of violence could spill out all over the country–and in time the entire region could be drawn into the conflict,” said Bush. In the Democratic Response following Bush’s address, freshman Senator Jim Webb of Virginia said the President had taken the country to war “recklessly,” proposing that Bush had disregarded the views of his advisors and the military prior to the conflict. The Senator went on to quote Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1952 crusade promise to end the Korean War, a pledge he kept once elected president. “Tonight we are calling on this president to take similar action,” said Webb. “If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will be showing him the way.” Most helpful customer reviews 28 of 29 people found the following review helpful. 8 of 8 people found the following review helpful. |





